Splint (Oral Orthosis) Adjustment, A Necessity?

Tags

Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Reversible treatment, TMJ rehabilitation

Absolutely not! In my opinion it is the initial sign of a pure failure in the first phase of the reversible treatment i.e. when the registration of the mandibular position, in which the device is going to be made, is taken.At the presence of a temporomandibular joint condylar asymmetry the higher condyle must be the guide in the registration. If this is not applied the splint will not provide bilateral oral stability and disturbing contacts will be the result.The never-ending trips to the dentist is being started.
A correctly made splint does not need any adjustments. It is a matter of how and when to wear the splint that will give the expected success.
There is one thing I cannot avoid to comment due to its absurdness. It was told in a discussion by a specialist in the field of facial pain that every splint needs to be adjusted regardless its fitness to the opposing jaw. Splint adjustment should show the patient the engagement and the involvment by the dentist. In other words, How stupid is that?

Too many adjustments on the dental work?

Tags

Asymmetry, Dentistry, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Oral rehabilitation, Oral Stability, Retruded Position of the Mandible, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

Take a new panoramic X-ray or reevaluate the most recently taken one! Compare the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles on the Ramus tangent. If they are not of equal height, start all over again and choose the higher condyle as the guide for your registration of the mandibular position to be used in the rehabilitation. In my opinion there is no other way to get the problem solved.
Merry Christmas and hopefully much less frustration and less adjustments in the Happy New Year!

Oral Orthosis (splint) Failure

Tags

Asymmetry, Bruxism, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Oral Stability, Retruded Position of the Mandible, TMJ rehabilitation

is a fact when the patient does not get any relief despite a faithful wearing of the splint. Numerous adjustments made by the dentistIt are reported by many patients and yet no positive result. It is my clinical experience and it is therefore my opinion that the failure is mostly due to an unsuccessful registration of the mandibular position in which the orthosis is supposed to be made as most orthoses seem to arrive from the dental laboratory in perfect condition. This unfortunate dilemma seems to happen very often when the intercuspal position has been chosen in the registration at the presence of a vertical temporomandibular joint condylar asymmetry.

To avoid unnecessary disappointments and frustrations for both parties (patient and the dentist) I therefore would like to emphasise the importance to recognise the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles.The analysis of a panoramic X-ray is an easy tool to use. At a vertical dimensional difference between the two temporomandibular joint condyles the difference can easily be transferred into the Maaxloc by Dentatus. That instrument visualises the vertical difference in the intermaxillary relation between the the two sides of the mounted casts at the occlusal level and thereby may assist in finding the clinically correct mandibular position for the fabrication of the oral orthosis. In this way the thickness of the orthosis may be different between the two sides of occlusion. What is missing in vertical dimension on the shorter condylar side must be compensated for at the level of the teeth.Much less adjustments of the orthosis may be the result not to say adjustments of the orthosis will not be necessary at all.

Occlusal Adjustment at a TMJ Condylar Asymmetry?

Tags

Asymmetry, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dental treatment, Dentistry, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Preprosthetic occlusal adjustment, Retruded Position of the Mandible, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

Be careful! The tooth contacts which seem to be occlusal interferences at the first sight when the conventional retruded contact position of the mandible is being executed may not be disturbing tooth contacts at all. If they are located on the higher condyle side they may denote the vertical dimension of the inter maxillary relationship and should in my opinion not be removed. Only precontacts on the shorter condyle side are to be looked upon as true interferences and can be removed to such an extent that tooth contacts are established on the higher condyle side.

With the risk of repeating myself I  do want to advise the clinician to build up the occlusion on the shorter condyle side instead of adjusting the teeth through occlusal adjustment on the higher condyle side.In this way we will secure a correct vertical dimension between the two jaws in occlusion and thereby rescue the patient from a too low vertical dimension of the occlusion after completed dental work often jeopardising the function the temporomandibular joints.

TMJ Condylar Asymmetry

Tags

Arthrogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Asymmetry, Asymmetry Index, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Oral rehabilitation, Oral Stability, Orthodontics, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint diagnostics, Temporomandibular joint disorder, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

when present,is a must to consider, in any dental rehabilitation. I dare to have this opinion after more than three decades of experience in treating ” asymmetrical ” patients shared with several successful colleagues. Although I repeat my opinion   it seems relevant as we on a regular basis are exposed to excellent crowns, bridges,supra constructions on implants and even completed orthodontics and yet a not satisfied patient.The chosen mandibular position for the rehabilitation in the majority of these patients has not been correct.

Results of recent research performed in different countries indicate that the mechanics of the temporomandibular joint is essential in order to maintain a pain free and functioning stomatognathic system (Quintessence International Symposium, Scottsdale,Arizona February 6-7, 2015). Overloading of the joint seems  not only to jeopardize the intraarticular structures of the joint resulting in anything from internal derangement to osteoarthritis but also to be the trigger for masticatory muscle pain.

At a vertical temporomandibular joint condylar asymmetry the loading of the two joints is in danger as the vertical dimensions of the two condyles are not equal. Therefor the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles need to be analyzed before any treatment is initiated. It is of utmost importance to determine the highest condyle as at an asymmetry  this condyle has to be the guide for the mandibular movement of  rotation(the Retruded Position of the Mandible)in which the rehabilitation is going to be executed.

Additionally,in patients with functional facial pain it sometimes might be difficult to clinically manipulate the mandible into the correct position for rehabilitation. At such occasions the result of the vertical condylar analysis in the panoramic X-ray easily can be transferred into the Maaxloc device by Dentatus, in which the index for the mandibular position of the planned rehabilitation is made.

TMD 2015, Condylar Asymmetry?

Tags

Arthrogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Asymmetry, Asymmetry Index, Bruxism, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Occlusal device, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint diagnostics, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Temporomandibular joint pain, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

Reflecting back on the interesting information given by eighteen well known international speakers at the Quintessence International Symposium on TMD & FACIAL PAIN and HEADACHE, Bridging the Gap Between Current Research and Clinical Practice in Scottsdale Arizona ( February 6-7,2015, Co-Chaired by Drs Daniel M.Laskin and Charles S.Greene ) I once again would like to stress the importance to recognize a temporomandibular joint condylar asymmetry when present. Several speakers stressed the overloaded temporomandibular joint as the cause of TMD and advised to pay less attention  to the masticatory muscles initially at  the examination of TMD pain. Lack of synovial liquid and mini ruptures or even nano ruptures of the joint tissues are to be looked upon as causes for cartilage degeneration with osteoarthritis / osteoarthrosis as the end result.

It is my opinion that in combination with bruxism a temporomandibular joint condylar asymmetry needs to be acknowledged and addressed. The shorter condyle side joint is in its morphology unstable and easily develops internal derangement of its articulating parts.  The well known phenomenon of disk displacement is thereby a fact and the first step in joint break down with the diagnosis Arthritis microtraumatica art.temp.mand. In this perspective occlusion becomes extremely important . The shorter condyle side joint needs to be supported with the correct vertical dimension of occlusion. What is missing in vertical dimension inside that joint needs to be compensated for at the level of the teeth of the ipsilateral side. In my mind this is the only possibility to create a stable occlusion with the maintenance of improved joint function after the initially reversible approach with an orthotic device.

Finally a statement/question that might need some thoughts: How much longer are we as a profession going to talk about occlusion without considering the vertical dimension of the two temporomandibular joints!?

House of Gnathology?

Tags

Arthrogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Asymmetry, Bruxism, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Myogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Occlusal adjustment, Oral Stability, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint diagnostics, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Temporomandibular joint pain, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

A week ago I had the pleasure to attend the XXVII International AIG (Associazione Italiana di Gnatologia) Congress in Torino, Italy. Twentyseven speakers from six countries each had about 30 minutes to present their thoughts about the relationship between occlusion and temporomandibular joint disorders. In general it could be concluded that a stable occlusion would improve the function of the stomatognathic system and thereby reduce the risk for developing or aggravating a temporomandibular joint disorder. It was also underlined in several lectures that gnathology is a team work and that occlusion is one tool in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder.
It was interesting to note that the speakers in general agreed in finding occlusion an important factor in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder, i.e. a complete contradiction to the conclusion of several hundreds of articles and studies proclaiming that when RDC/TMD are used in the evaluation of treatment outcome occlusion is not important and should not get priority or most often not even be considered in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder.

RDC/TMD were discussed and by a great part of the participants even questioned in the final round table discussion of the congress. In my opinion and in agreement with many other clinicians RDC/TMD cannot and should not be used in the clinical situation in which a specific diagnosis is to be the sound base for the treatment. Reliable criteria like maximum mouth opening, mandibular movements, the difference between dynamic and static pain and even the difference between the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles visible and measurable in a panoramic X-ray exist. Therefore my suggestion to the RDC/TMD supporters is: Next time you conduct a clinical study, why not incorporate the above mentioned criteria! I am pretty convinced that the results will be different regarding the eventual link between occlusion and the temporomandibular joint disorder.

Finally I would delete the ? from the title of this blog and agree with the suggestion from Dr.Eugenio Tanteri that a forum “House of Gnathology” might come to an agreement that a correctly designed and applied occlusion is important in providing  oral stability and thereby reduce the prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders among our patients.

Indices for jaw registrations

Tags

Bruxism, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Mounting casts, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Occlusion, Retruded Position of the Mandible, TMJ rehabilitation

Sometimes it can be difficult to get a relaxed mandible in the process of jaw registration in the retruded position of the mandible in as well the diagnostic phase as in the steps of treatment. It happens mostly when the patient is a heavy bruxer or when the patient seems to defend him/herself against the pressure from the hands of the dentist in the clinical situation. A condylar asymmetry may add to the clinical difficulty in getting the registration right.
With the measurements of the vertical dimensions of the temporomandibular joint condyles and the Maaxloc device at hands the above mentioned problems can definitely be reduced.It is my opinion, which to a great extent I have achieved from the dental technicians, that the registrations made in the Maaxloc system get into a more retruded position of the mandible in comparison with the manually taken clinical indices which often are protruded.This conclusion is based upon several years of cooperation with Ines Selimanovic T.I.C. laboratory, Malmoe ,Sweden, an experienced dental technician, with whom I have made comparisons of by me taken clinical indices and by her made registrations in the Maaxloc device.
In conc;usion: To avoid unnecessary and time consuming adjustments despite quality of the dental work in the ” difficult mouth “it might be worth while to become critical to the manually taken clinical registration and consider the advantage of the Maaxloc device.

Tinnitus and TMD

Tags

Asymmetry, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Oral Stability, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Tinnitus, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

Tinnitus in itself is not an indication for dental intervention. However,if tinnitus is mentioned at an examination of facial pain of either myogeneous or arthrogeneous origin there may be a chance to influence its existence. After reviewing some records of patients some years ago and present experience it is my opinion that it is about one third of the patients suffering tinnitus and TMD who will notice a reduction or even a total elimination of their tinnitus from oral stability initially from a stabilization splint compensating for a temporomandibular joint vertical condylar asymmetry, when present.

As it was just one third who reported a benefit regarding their tinnitus it must be up to the patient to decide if it is worth while to invest in an oral device fighting tinnitus. Objective information regarding a dubious result should precede the decision. It is also  important to tell the patient that very often the relief from tinnitus does not come immediately after the insertion of the device. It is reported by several patients that it could take a couple of months before they noticed a difference in their tinnitus. In conclusion: When a stabilization splint is being delivered  in trying to influence a tinnitus the patient might have to wear the splint several months before a change occurs  and before one actually knows if it was beneficial or not. 

Mounting casts

Tags

Asymmetry, Asymmetry Index, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dental laboratory work, Dentistry, Mounting casts, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Occlusion, Oral rehabilitation, Oral Stability, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

The other day I had to check the mounting of the casts of the upper and lower jaws of a patient with a condylar asymmetry of about 6%. The reason for my visit to the dental laboratory was that the right side lower four units bridge had been redone and several times before that adjusted. And yet the patient found it too low i.e. her teeth of her right side did not contact in occlusion unless she  forced her mandible to the right.

During the visit at the laboratory it became once again obvious to me from the discussions with two well experienced dental technicians that very often the indices to be used in mounting the casts cannot be used. The indices are perforated and mostly show slides in the material used indicating that the mandible of the patient has not been stable at the time of index registration.  Therefore the technicians try to analyze different facets of the occlusal surfaces of the casts. They try to fake the movements of the patients mouth that have created them and thereafter, still manually, they fix the casts in the position which seems to  be the starting point for the suspected movement.This position usually is looked upon as the intercuspal position and will be used for the subsequent mounting of the casts.

At a condylar asymmetry it is therefore easy to understand that with the above described mounting of the casts the crowns or bridges of the ” shorter condyle ” side will be too low. Clinically oral stability will be lacking despite the insertion of the prosthodontic work. Very often tooth contacts of the ” higher condyle  ” side will be looked upon as occlusal interferences and removed in an ” adjustment “.This actually results in a decrease of the vertical dimension and a not one hundred percentage satisfied patient.

The problem and frustration can easily be avoided if the vertical condylar asymmetry is transferred into the Maaxloc instrument. A registration at the clinic or at the laboratory is made  and used in mounting the casts with the result that mostly the prosthodontic work can be inserted  without any adjustment at its delivery.