• About

Tore L. Hansson

~ Temporomandibular joint dysfunction or craniomandibular disorders from a clinical and practical point of view, focusing on TMJ condylar asymmetry when present.

Tore L. Hansson

Tag Archives: Occlusal adjustment

Too many adjustments on the dental work?

22 Tuesday Dec 2015

Posted by torelhansson in Condylar asymmetry, dentistry, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Asymmetry, Dentistry, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Oral rehabilitation, Oral Stability, Retruded Position of the Mandible, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

Take a new panoramic X-ray or reevaluate the most recently taken one! Compare the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles on the Ramus tangent. If they are not of equal height, start all over again and choose the higher condyle as the guide for your registration of the mandibular position to be used in the rehabilitation. In my opinion there is no other way to get the problem solved.
Merry Christmas and hopefully much less frustration and less adjustments in the Happy New Year!

Advertisement

Occlusal Adjustment at a TMJ Condylar Asymmetry?

17 Tuesday Mar 2015

Posted by torelhansson in Condylar asymmetry, dentistry, Function & dysfunction of the stomatognathic system, Mandibular position, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Prosthodontics, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint (a)symmetry, Treatment planning, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Asymmetry, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dental treatment, Dentistry, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Preprosthetic occlusal adjustment, Retruded Position of the Mandible, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

Be careful! The tooth contacts which seem to be occlusal interferences at the first sight when the conventional retruded contact position of the mandible is being executed may not be disturbing tooth contacts at all. If they are located on the higher condyle side they may denote the vertical dimension of the inter maxillary relationship and should in my opinion not be removed. Only precontacts on the shorter condyle side are to be looked upon as true interferences and can be removed to such an extent that tooth contacts are established on the higher condyle side.

With the risk of repeating myself I  do want to advise the clinician to build up the occlusion on the shorter condyle side instead of adjusting the teeth through occlusal adjustment on the higher condyle side.In this way we will secure a correct vertical dimension between the two jaws in occlusion and thereby rescue the patient from a too low vertical dimension of the occlusion after completed dental work often jeopardising the function the temporomandibular joints.

House of Gnathology?

13 Monday Oct 2014

Posted by torelhansson in Arthrogeneous origin of pain, Asymmetry Index TMJ, Condylar asymmetry, dentistry, Function & dysfunction of the stomatognathic system, Functional pain, Mandibular position, Myogeneous origin of pain, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Orthopantomogram OPG, Prosthodontics, Temporomandibular joint (a)symmetry, Temporomandibular Joint Disk Displacement, Tension headache, tooth clenching, tooth grinding, Treatment planning, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Arthrogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Asymmetry, Bruxism, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Myogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Occlusal adjustment, Oral Stability, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint diagnostics, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Temporomandibular joint pain, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

A week ago I had the pleasure to attend the XXVII International AIG (Associazione Italiana di Gnatologia) Congress in Torino, Italy. Twentyseven speakers from six countries each had about 30 minutes to present their thoughts about the relationship between occlusion and temporomandibular joint disorders. In general it could be concluded that a stable occlusion would improve the function of the stomatognathic system and thereby reduce the risk for developing or aggravating a temporomandibular joint disorder. It was also underlined in several lectures that gnathology is a team work and that occlusion is one tool in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder.
It was interesting to note that the speakers in general agreed in finding occlusion an important factor in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder, i.e. a complete contradiction to the conclusion of several hundreds of articles and studies proclaiming that when RDC/TMD are used in the evaluation of treatment outcome occlusion is not important and should not get priority or most often not even be considered in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder.

RDC/TMD were discussed and by a great part of the participants even questioned in the final round table discussion of the congress. In my opinion and in agreement with many other clinicians RDC/TMD cannot and should not be used in the clinical situation in which a specific diagnosis is to be the sound base for the treatment. Reliable criteria like maximum mouth opening, mandibular movements, the difference between dynamic and static pain and even the difference between the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles visible and measurable in a panoramic X-ray exist. Therefore my suggestion to the RDC/TMD supporters is: Next time you conduct a clinical study, why not incorporate the above mentioned criteria! I am pretty convinced that the results will be different regarding the eventual link between occlusion and the temporomandibular joint disorder.

Finally I would delete the ? from the title of this blog and agree with the suggestion from Dr.Eugenio Tanteri that a forum “House of Gnathology” might come to an agreement that a correctly designed and applied occlusion is important in providing  oral stability and thereby reduce the prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders among our patients.

Mounting casts

04 Tuesday Mar 2014

Posted by torelhansson in Asymmetry Index TMJ, Condylar asymmetry, dentistry, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Prosthodontics, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint (a)symmetry, Tension headache, Treatment planning, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Asymmetry, Asymmetry Index, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dental laboratory work, Dentistry, Mounting casts, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Occlusion, Oral rehabilitation, Oral Stability, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

The other day I had to check the mounting of the casts of the upper and lower jaws of a patient with a condylar asymmetry of about 6%. The reason for my visit to the dental laboratory was that the right side lower four units bridge had been redone and several times before that adjusted. And yet the patient found it too low i.e. her teeth of her right side did not contact in occlusion unless she  forced her mandible to the right.

During the visit at the laboratory it became once again obvious to me from the discussions with two well experienced dental technicians that very often the indices to be used in mounting the casts cannot be used. The indices are perforated and mostly show slides in the material used indicating that the mandible of the patient has not been stable at the time of index registration.  Therefore the technicians try to analyze different facets of the occlusal surfaces of the casts. They try to fake the movements of the patients mouth that have created them and thereafter, still manually, they fix the casts in the position which seems to  be the starting point for the suspected movement.This position usually is looked upon as the intercuspal position and will be used for the subsequent mounting of the casts.

At a condylar asymmetry it is therefore easy to understand that with the above described mounting of the casts the crowns or bridges of the ” shorter condyle ” side will be too low. Clinically oral stability will be lacking despite the insertion of the prosthodontic work. Very often tooth contacts of the ” higher condyle  ” side will be looked upon as occlusal interferences and removed in an ” adjustment “.This actually results in a decrease of the vertical dimension and a not one hundred percentage satisfied patient.

The problem and frustration can easily be avoided if the vertical condylar asymmetry is transferred into the Maaxloc instrument. A registration at the clinic or at the laboratory is made  and used in mounting the casts with the result that mostly the prosthodontic work can be inserted  without any adjustment at its delivery.

Asymmetry Index ( AI ) for temporomandibular joint Condylar Asymmetry

26 Wednesday Feb 2014

Posted by torelhansson in Arthrogeneous origin of pain, Asymmetry Index TMJ, Condylar asymmetry, dentistry, Function & dysfunction of the stomatognathic system, Functional pain, Mandibular position, Myogeneous origin of pain, Occlusion, Prosthodontics, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint (a)symmetry, Tension headache, Treatment planning, Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Arthrogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Asymmetry, Asymmetry Index, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Myogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Occlusal adjustment, Oral rehabilitation, Oral Stability, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Reversible treatment, Temporomandibular joint, Temporomandibular joint diagnostics, Tension headache, TMJ rehabilitation

For more than twenty years I have been working on a regular basis with Dr Ugo Gambardella, Medical Space in Seriate, Italy. In 1993 we founded the T.A.C. Seriate clinic, ( Team Approach to Craniomandibular disorders ) in order to optimize the diagnostics and treatment of patients suffering facial pain due to dysfunction of the stomatognathic system. Dr Gambardella was already then experienced in prosthodontics as well as in implantology.
Already at the start it became obvious to us that a large portion of the mostly referred patients showed a condylar asymmetry and a lack of oral stability. Initially our treatment aimed at a normalization of the stomatognathic system via a stabilization splint in its design compensating for the condylar asymmetry, when present, and providing at least a temporary oral stability. After 6 – 12 months several patients wanted to have permanent oral stability, which then was achieved through mostly prosthodontics , sometimes in combination with preprosthetic orthodontics.
Some years ago and then more than 5 years after completed treatment the patients were invited to have their situation evaluated and to tell how they felt and how they were functioning after treatment. The equivalent clinical examination of their stomatognathic system was executed by an Italian speaking colleague, who did not know what kind of treatment the patients had got or been exposed to. The teeth depicted in the panoramic overview X-rays were covered i.e. made not visible to the examiner while the two temporomandibular joints were shown.
The condylar asymmetry was analyzed and for each patient an Asymmetry Index ( AI ) was calculated according to the following formula: ( R – L : R + L ) x 100 i.e. the right side condylar height minus the left side condylar height divided by the sum of the right and left side condylar heights multiplied by 100. Thus an asymmetry index was expressed in percentage for each patient.
The results of the subsequent analysis showed that after more than five years with permanent oral stability no patient any longer was found with a mainly arthrogeneous origin of pain. Myogeneous origin of pain was also frequently eliminated or markedly reduced. All patients showed an increase of maximum mouth opening.
The patients were grouped and analyzed according to the asymmetry index ( AI ) . It can be concluded from the results that patients with an AI > 3 % in general benefit from reversible treatment. Patients with an AI in the range between 3 % and 10 % may do well with just a temporary oral stability in form of a stabilization splint i.e. the splint can be worn part time, which for most patients means during sleep. As the participating patients with an AI > 10 % definitely benefitted the most and also felt subjectively completely different, mostly totally pain free after the treatment it is our opinion, that when you find a condylar asymmetry > 10 % in a patient with a diagnosed facial pain, you can comfortably suggest permanent occlusal treatment after the initially reversible period in the correct mandibular position guided by the higher temporomandibular joint condyle. The permanent treatment then executed in the same mandibular position will provide oral stability.

Occlusal ” interferences ” at condylar asymmetry

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by torelhansson in Arthrogeneous origin of pain, Function & dysfunction of the stomatognathic system, Functional pain, Mandibular position, Myogeneous origin of pain, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusion, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint (a)symmetry, Tension headache, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Asymmetry, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Occlusal adjustment, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Occlusion, Preprosthetic occlusal adjustment, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Temporomandibular joint pain

must be carefully evaluated before any action is taken. It is as important and necessary to realize as it is absolutely wrong to adjust occlusal  pre contacts in the acute situation of functional facial pain.The latter  ” interferences ” may not be real as they might not exist under normal or pain free circumstances. They might be due to changed muscular conditions in the dysfunction of the stomatognathic system and most probably they will disappear with a normalization of the function. In my opinion it is therefore an absolute necessity to always normalize the muscle function via reversible means before any change of the occlusal surfaces takes place. This is done through the insertion of a stabilization splint made in the correct mandibular position, based upon the findings of the condylar heights visible in the panoramic x- ray, and worn according to the preliminary diagnosis during 4-6 months . Not until then an occlusal adjustment can be considered.

Although occlusal pre contacts cause an oral instability with mostly a slide between the retruded position of the mandible ( RPM ) and the intercuspal position ( ICP )  pre contacts on the ” higher condyle ” side may indicate the true vertical dimension of the occlusion ( the static relation between the teeth of the maxilla and of the mandible ).Therefore these contacts will function as the guide  for an increase of the vertical dimensions of the teeth not in contact  on the opposite side in equivalent regions. Thus ,it is my advice that, occlusal pre contacts on the ” higher condyle ” side should not be removed. If so, there is a major risk that the vertical dimension will get decreased and problems due to a too low vertical dimension of the occlusion will occur.

Occlusal pre contacts on the ” shorter condyle ” side  in the retruded position of the mandible ( RPM ) most likely are true interferences and can therefore be removed after a normalization of the muscle function. They should also be removed prior to the introduction of new elements into the occlusion via prosthodontics.

At condylar symmetry i.e. when the two condylar heights are of equal size, pre contacts in the retruded position of the mandible ( RPM ) should be removed pre prostodontically. If no further rehabilitation is planned or indicated these pre contacts can be left unless they produce a  major lateral slide between the retruded position of the mandible ( RPM ) and the intercuspal  position (ICP ).The general rule remains: DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO UNNECESSARY CHANGES OF THE OCCLUSION IN A PATIENT WITHOUT PAIN !  NEVER APPLY  OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENT AS A PURE PREVENTION !

Recent Posts

  • House of Gnathology part II
  • Splint (Oral Orthosis) Adjustment, A Necessity?
  • Too many adjustments on the dental work?
  • Prefabricated occlusal devices,mouth guards or splints
  • Splint adjustments

Recent Comments

torelhansson on House of Gnathology part …
Paul C. Riley, DDS on House of Gnathology part …
torelhansson on Asymmetry Index ( AI ) for tem…
R on Asymmetry Index ( AI ) for tem…
marjan on TMJ Condylar Asymmetry

Archives

  • December 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Abused protrusion
  • Arthrogeneous origin of pain
  • Asymmetry Index TMJ
  • Bruxism
  • Condylar asymmetry
  • dentistry
  • Function & dysfunction of the stomatognathic system
  • Functional pain
  • Gnathology
  • Implantology
  • Mandibular position
  • Myogeneous origin of pain
  • Occlusal adjustment
  • Occlusal device
  • Occlusal splints
  • Occlusion
  • Occlusion
  • Orthodontics
  • Orthopantomogram OPG
  • Orthosis
  • Prosthodontics
  • Retruded Position of the Mandible
  • Reversible treatment
  • Temporomandibular joint (a)symmetry
  • Temporomandibular Joint Clicking and Popping
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disk Displacement
  • Temporomandibular joint morphology
  • Temporomandibular Joint Sounds
  • Tension headache
  • TMD
  • TMJ radiology
  • tooth clenching
  • tooth grinding
  • Treatment planning
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • House of Gnathology part II
  • Splint (Oral Orthosis) Adjustment, A Necessity?
  • Too many adjustments on the dental work?
  • Prefabricated occlusal devices,mouth guards or splints
  • Splint adjustments

Recent Comments

torelhansson on House of Gnathology part …
Paul C. Riley, DDS on House of Gnathology part …
torelhansson on Asymmetry Index ( AI ) for tem…
R on Asymmetry Index ( AI ) for tem…
marjan on TMJ Condylar Asymmetry

Archives

  • December 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Abused protrusion
  • Arthrogeneous origin of pain
  • Asymmetry Index TMJ
  • Bruxism
  • Condylar asymmetry
  • dentistry
  • Function & dysfunction of the stomatognathic system
  • Functional pain
  • Gnathology
  • Implantology
  • Mandibular position
  • Myogeneous origin of pain
  • Occlusal adjustment
  • Occlusal device
  • Occlusal splints
  • Occlusion
  • Occlusion
  • Orthodontics
  • Orthopantomogram OPG
  • Orthosis
  • Prosthodontics
  • Retruded Position of the Mandible
  • Reversible treatment
  • Temporomandibular joint (a)symmetry
  • Temporomandibular Joint Clicking and Popping
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disk Displacement
  • Temporomandibular joint morphology
  • Temporomandibular Joint Sounds
  • Tension headache
  • TMD
  • TMJ radiology
  • tooth clenching
  • tooth grinding
  • Treatment planning
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Tore L. Hansson
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Tore L. Hansson
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar