Prefabricated occlusal devices,mouth guards or splints

Tags

Bruxism, Dentistry, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Retruded Position of the Mandible

should in my opinion not be recommended or not even be considered. If there is a need for the above mentioned appliances there is always to be a diagnosis that can support their therapeutic aims. The dentist is the person who is qualified for the decision to be made before any intervention into the oral cavity. It is also of great importance that the oral device is made or fabricated in the correct mandibular position or in the correct relationship between the two jaws.

Most often the indication for an occlusal device is that the patient ( person in pain) is lacking an oral stability, which is being described by the patient as he/she does not know “how to bite”. This is mostly the reason why the patient is searching for a stable occlusion and this seems too often to  be the reason for the bruxing, used in advertisement as the indication for testing the prefabricated oral device.

When a prefabricated oral device is being applied or tried out by the patient him/herself the following is most likely to occur. The patient is biting into a mandibular position recognised and commonly  used as the bruxoposition. In other words, the patient does not get a new symmetrically balanced occlusion on the device. The search for stability will therefore go on. Another disadvantage with the kit for a prefabricated occlusal device is the softness of the material to be used.A soft material between the upper and lower jaws in a bruxer seems to function more as a resilient chewing gum instead of creating an oral stability. Thereby  the bruxing will continue and sometimes even increase. In conclusion, the promised relief in using the prefabricated splint will never occur.

A functioning splint definitely needs to be designed, checked, delivered and monitored by the dentist.

 

 

 

 

House of Gnathology?

Tags

Arthrogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Asymmetry, Bruxism, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Myogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Occlusal adjustment, Oral Stability, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint diagnostics, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Temporomandibular joint pain, TMJ rehabilitation, Treatment planning

A week ago I had the pleasure to attend the XXVII International AIG (Associazione Italiana di Gnatologia) Congress in Torino, Italy. Twentyseven speakers from six countries each had about 30 minutes to present their thoughts about the relationship between occlusion and temporomandibular joint disorders. In general it could be concluded that a stable occlusion would improve the function of the stomatognathic system and thereby reduce the risk for developing or aggravating a temporomandibular joint disorder. It was also underlined in several lectures that gnathology is a team work and that occlusion is one tool in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder.
It was interesting to note that the speakers in general agreed in finding occlusion an important factor in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder, i.e. a complete contradiction to the conclusion of several hundreds of articles and studies proclaiming that when RDC/TMD are used in the evaluation of treatment outcome occlusion is not important and should not get priority or most often not even be considered in the treatment of a temporomandibular joint disorder.

RDC/TMD were discussed and by a great part of the participants even questioned in the final round table discussion of the congress. In my opinion and in agreement with many other clinicians RDC/TMD cannot and should not be used in the clinical situation in which a specific diagnosis is to be the sound base for the treatment. Reliable criteria like maximum mouth opening, mandibular movements, the difference between dynamic and static pain and even the difference between the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles visible and measurable in a panoramic X-ray exist. Therefore my suggestion to the RDC/TMD supporters is: Next time you conduct a clinical study, why not incorporate the above mentioned criteria! I am pretty convinced that the results will be different regarding the eventual link between occlusion and the temporomandibular joint disorder.

Finally I would delete the ? from the title of this blog and agree with the suggestion from Dr.Eugenio Tanteri that a forum “House of Gnathology” might come to an agreement that a correctly designed and applied occlusion is important in providing  oral stability and thereby reduce the prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders among our patients.

Migraine or ?

Tags

Bruxism, Dentistry, Facial pain, Myogeneous origin of TMJ pain, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Reversible treatment, Tension headache

Although the specific diagnosis of migraine is defined as a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent moderate to severe headaches often in association with a number of autonomic nervous system symptoms it is often by our dental patients used as the general term for facial pain with often also no response to the prescribed medication. This experience I share with many colleagues and yet I have to tell you about the 36 years old man, who was referred for chronic left side facial pain he had suffered for 18 years, half of his life. He had visited many doctors and he had also been taking a lot of medication during the years.

The pain occurred almost every day and was described by the patient as migraine on the left side of his face covering the left side temple and cheek area. Mandibular movements were normal. A panoramic X-ray did not reveal any pathology and showed a temporomandibular joint condylar symmetry.Static pain could be provoked for closing of his mouth. During our conversation it became obvious that a left side latero-protrusion was an often used position for bruxism, which also could be confirmed by marked facets of his left side front teeth.

After information about the possibility to initially wear a stabilization splint part time ( during day time working hours )  in order to avoid his unilateral abuse of the left side mm temporalis and the deep portion of masseter he decided to try. The stabilization splint was designed around the retruded position of his mandible, inserted without any adjustments and checked after another 6 weeks. At that time the young man announced that he had been completely free from any facial pain since the day after the insertion of the splint. It had been worn during the day except for chewing. He also showed an oral stability without the splint in his mouth.

In conclusion: When the dental patient is telling about his or her migraine that is not responding to the, by the medical doctor, prescribed medication DO PERFORM A FUNCTIONAL EXAMINATION OF THE STOMATOGNATHIC SYSTEM. There might be a chance to help the patient and not only his or her teeth.

 

 

 

 

Indices for jaw registrations

Tags

Bruxism, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Dentistry, Mounting casts, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Occlusion, Retruded Position of the Mandible, TMJ rehabilitation

Sometimes it can be difficult to get a relaxed mandible in the process of jaw registration in the retruded position of the mandible in as well the diagnostic phase as in the steps of treatment. It happens mostly when the patient is a heavy bruxer or when the patient seems to defend him/herself against the pressure from the hands of the dentist in the clinical situation. A condylar asymmetry may add to the clinical difficulty in getting the registration right.
With the measurements of the vertical dimensions of the temporomandibular joint condyles and the Maaxloc device at hands the above mentioned problems can definitely be reduced.It is my opinion, which to a great extent I have achieved from the dental technicians, that the registrations made in the Maaxloc system get into a more retruded position of the mandible in comparison with the manually taken clinical indices which often are protruded.This conclusion is based upon several years of cooperation with Ines Selimanovic T.I.C. laboratory, Malmoe ,Sweden, an experienced dental technician, with whom I have made comparisons of by me taken clinical indices and by her made registrations in the Maaxloc device.
In conc;usion: To avoid unnecessary and time consuming adjustments despite quality of the dental work in the ” difficult mouth “it might be worth while to become critical to the manually taken clinical registration and consider the advantage of the Maaxloc device.

Reversible Oral Stability, One Splint and that’s it

Tags

Asymmetry, Bruxism, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Condyle (anatomy), Dentistry, Occlusal device, Occlusal splint, Radiography, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Temporomandibular joint pain

Through the insertion of a stabilization splint fabricated in the correct mandibular position i.e. in RPM(=),RPM(R) or RPM(L) it is easy ,not to say the only way, to confirm or justify the preliminary diagnosis of the complaint of facial pain.Needless to say , I take for granted that the mandibular position is determined from the analysis of the vertical dimensions of the two temporomandibular joint condyles visible in the panoramic x-ray. The values conclude with the difference in mm provided the technician with the impressions of the upper and lower jaws. Via Maaxloc you or your technician produce the index with which the models are mounted into the articulator of your choice. The splint is fabricated in hot curing acrylic and at a condylar asymmetry it will be somewhat thicker at the ” shorter condyle ” side ,as it is compensating what is missing in the vertical dimension of that condylar height. The splint does not need to be adjusted if your measurements and impressions/models are correct. It fits directly into the mouth of your patient. There are many hard and good working technicians who perfectly provide excellent splints. My opinion is that if the dentist needs to adjust a splint the error most likely must have happened in the clinical situation as the technician is working with the models of non changeable materials and correctly mounted in the articulator.

The patient is then to wear the splint depending upon the preliminary diagnosis. Full time use, 24 hours a day, except at eating at arthrogeneous origin of pain as the anatomical joint structures need support. Part time use of the splint, day OR night, at myogeneous origin of pain as the masticatory muscles needs to be interrupted in their hyperfunction  i.e. given the possibility to rest. I do think that the reason why even  perfectly fit splints do not give the patient any relief is that the splint is worn at the wrong time of the 24 hours. To wear a splint during sleep when bruxing occurs during the day does not make any sense to me. Just a change in the way the patient is wearing the splint may result in complete relief.

Personally I never prescribe soft splints. In my opinion they function as chewing gum due to their resilience and should be avoided in any bruxing situation. In conclusion, there is only one splint that also can be looked upon as universal . That is the conventionally made stabilization splint  ( the old Michigan splint ) fabricated around the correct mandibular position in RPM. No problem All continents !

 

Maaxloc, the mandibular axis locator

Tags

Asymmetry, Bruxism, Centric relation, condylar asymmetry recognition, Condyle (anatomy), Dentistry, Occlusion, Radiography, Retruded Position of the Mandible, Temporomandibular joint, Temporomandibular joint diagnostics, Temporomandibular joint disorder, Temporomandibular joint pain

Several years ago I met with and was introduced to Kenneth Wallenholm, an experienced dental technician in Stockholm, Sweden. I was giving a lecture and he was in the audience. I had talked about the recognition of temporomandibular joint condylar asymmetry, when present, and its importance for a correct registration of the mandibular position to be used as the reference position for optimal dental work clinically as well as in the dental laboratory. He had immediately understood my message and for a long time also realized that most “wax bites”, indices or ” Registrat ” accompanying dental impressions into the laboratories most frequently ended up in the trash can, never being used. The reason was that these ” wax bites ” did not provide any information about the workable intermaxillary relation. The technicians therefore rather related the upper and lower models of the jaws by hand i.e. they just tried to find the best stability between the models,maybe sometimes the intercuspal position, before they started their technical procedures to establish an acceptable occlusion. We were  both of the same opinion that such unfortunate events outside the mouth of the patient are the major reasons  for clinically unwanted adjustments of dental work before its  insertion into the mouth.

It did not take us long time until we met again and started to brain storm how to come up with a device in order to facilitate for the dentist / technician team to ascertain and improve the registration of the correct mandibular position to be used by both the professions. After many hours, many different measurements, several different drawings and a certain number of pieces of ” metal constructions ” the patent was approved and the prototype for the Maaxloc  was completed by Dentatus ( info@dentatus.se : dentatus@dentatus.com )

The Maaxloc determines the clinically correct mandibular position. The Maaxloc is not an articulator even if it is described under articulators in the list of products from Dentatus. The Maaxloc is a device to assist in finding the correct mandibular position of reference at a recognized condylar / mandibular asymmetry. The registration index produced in the Maaxloc can be  used in any articulator of your choice and can comfortably be applied in cases of craniomandibular or temporomandibular disorders,as well as in any case of prosthetic rehabilitation or orthodontic analysis. Determining the correct mandibular position of reference is of utmost importance and will help to avoid unwanted occlusal features. This includes achieving the correct incline of implants into the jaws and improving the occlusal analysis before an orthodontic treatment is initiated.

The Maaxloc is time saving and reduces pain because:

1.Symmetry in occlusal contacts between the jaws decreases the risk of failure in providing bilateral load to the stomatognathic system.

2.Less time is spent on adjustments and on remakes due to fractures in veneers and crown & bridge work, including supra structures on successfully accepted implants.

3.Shorter sessions for repetitive registrations of the mandibular positions.

4.A stable occlusion compensates a morphological asymmetry, improves the general adaptation of tissues and is especially beneficial to the edentulous patient wearing removable prostheses, with less dislocation of the prostheses.

5.Last but not least, once the individually correct mandibular position has been found, the patients immediately acknowledge their natural way of achieving and sensing oral stability

It  is my convinced opinion that the measurements of the condylar heights in a panoramic ( overview ) x-ray and  the difference between the two sides transferred into  the Maaxloc will further your clinical success and confidence.